Adult Growth of the Dental Arch

September 4, 2017 Roger Solow DDS

Successful restorative dentistry now hinges on an understanding that physiological changes occur over a lifetime. It’s detrimental to treat the dynamic relationship between dental occlusion and adjacent craniofacial structures as static.

We are all generally familiar with the fact that there is a significant change in facial profile (convex to straight) between adolescence and adulthood. Jaw growth usually ends between 17 and 20-ish years old, but 3-dimensional craniofacial skeletal growth and remodeling does not cease after adolescence.

It’s lifelong growth even though it’s slow. As a result, we can’t consider adult patients morphologically stable. This is actually a relatively new concept that we’ve become aware of because of implant dentistry.

So what does this mean for restorations? First, we need more information.

Physiological Changes and Restorative Dentistry: A Quick Overview

These adult growth changes can be seen in both a decrease and increase in the dimensions of the craniofacial skeleton. There is an increase in maxillary and mandibular anterior dentoalveolar heights.

We should also pay attention to vertical growth of the maxilla, which continues after transverse and sagittal growth end. It has been suggested that reductions seen in arch width, depth, and perimeter may be due to interstitial wear and mesial drift. The latter occurs because of an occlusal force stemming from root angulation, mesial eruption force and the direction of occlusal contact during chewing. It’s integral to consider tooth movement because it compensates for wear while maintaining interproximal contacts.

There are different patterns of growth in short-faced and long-faced people. Short-faced individuals have greater transverse maxillary growth. As they mature, their anterior teeth tip forward and enable mesial drift. This process occurs more vertically in long-faced people. Short-faced individuals experience upward buccal movement of the teeth, while long-faced individuals experience lingual movement and continual tooth eruption that supports a normal interarch relationship.

What we now know from recent research is that eruption after the tooth has reached occlusal contact is a compensatory response to occlusal wear. Eruption creates vertical growth if there is no occlusal wear.

A comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between all of these changes in the dental arch is essential to restorative dentistry.

How do you keep up to date on the latest dental research? We’d love to hear your tips in the comments! 

Related Course

Functional Esthetic Excellence Utilizing 100% Digital Workflow

DATE: June 13 2024 @ 8:00 am - June 15 2024 @ 2:00 pm

Location: The Pankey Institute


Regular Tuition: $ 2995

night with private bath: $ 290

This Course Is Sold Out! Embracing Digital Dentistry This course will introduce each participant to the possibilities of complex case planning utilizing 100% digital workflows. Special emphasis will be placed…

Learn More>

About Author

User Image
Roger Solow DDS

Roger Solow received a BA in Biology from UCLA in 1975 and his DDS with honors from University of the Pacific School of Dentistry in 1978. He is a general dentist and has a full time, fee-for-service practice that he limits to restorative dentistry in Mill Valley, California. He is a Pankey Scholar and a lead visiting faculty at the Pankey Institute in Key Biscayne, Florida. He has taught restorative dentistry at UOP Dental School and has lectured to study clubs, dental societies, and the national meetings of the Academy of General Dentistry. Dr. Solow is a Fellow of the American College of Dentistry. Dr. Solow is a frequently published author.

2 thoughts on “Adult Growth of the Dental Arch

  1. The first issue is understanding at-risk patients so you can prevent the problem since treatment after the problem is not the best solution. You can see the entire article on the Pankey Virtual Institute or email me, for the original article. Crossing the arch is not really at issue here as adjacent tooth eruption relative to the fixed position implant occurs at and away from midline sites. Crossing the arch with multiple splinted implant-implant or implant-tooth restoration could prevent eruption problems but incurs other restorative problems (one problem area affects many teeth) and it is much better to separate implant restorations into single or multiple small segment restorations.

  2. Roger, so with this information, how do we decide when a patient is “old enough” to replace a missing tooth (say a maxillary lateral incisor) with an implant?
    I was originally taught 18 for girls and 20 for boys. And now understand it to be more like 20 for girls and 22 for boys.
    Also, how does the wearing of an occlusal splint effect or restrict some of this late vertical growth?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.