by Lee Ann Brady 

Have you ever noticed a confused look on the face of an older dental patient when you tell them they have a cavity? Many people falsely assume that only small children develop cavities. When I let older adults know that they have one or more cavities, they say something like, “Wait, I thought only kids get cavities” or “I haven’t had a cavity in decades.”  

They honestly think we outgrow that, so I typically say to these patients, “I know you’re thinking that cavities are something that only kids get, and you’ve outgrown this. But that isn’t accurate. Yes, kids are often prone to getting cavities, but adults can get them for the same reasons.” 

Most of my older adults with cavities are doing a good job with their oral hygiene, so I will explain four things to them.  

1. As we age our saliva is no longer as protective. There are also lots of medications older adults take that diminish saliva production. But, even if our mouth does not feel dry, the saliva does not protect us against bacteria and plaque as well as when we were younger. 
2. As we age our taste buds change, and the foods that satisfy us the most are carbohydrates, so like children, older adults tend to eat more sugary foods. 
3. As we age, if we have gum recession, we have larger space between our teeth, and this tends to trap more food particles that feed bacteria.
    
4. After teeth are restored, normal function over time can introduce openings in the restoration, and bacteria can creep into those openings. 

After we talk about the various reasons that they and other older adults may get cavities, we talk about the fact that there are several preventive strategies and I suggest ones they might like to try.  

My patients enjoy our conversations because they know I really care about them, and I will happily spend time explaining why changes are occurring in their mouth. They appreciate hearing that their problem is not unusual and there are strategies to avoid cavities going forward. 

By Paul A. Henny, DDS 

The word “prescriptive” recently got stuck in my head. It made me think about the important distinction between a relationship that’s primarily focused around “giving directions or injunctions” versus mutually goal-oriented and collaborative. It’s all too easy in the middle of a busy day to reduce our patients’ complex problems down to prescriptive responses so we can move on to the next problem or obligation on our schedule.  

The reality of dentistry was brilliantly stated long ago by Bob Barkley, “Our goal is to design dentistry that will fail at the slowest possible rate.” This humble statement should always sit at the center of our practice philosophy: We aren’t gods; hence we aren’t perfect, and we can’t control the future. The best we can do is learn, practice, and do our best with the best of intentions. The rest will be up to the patient and fate.  

If our patients choose to not assertively take charge of their oral microbiome through appropriate oral hygiene and diet management, then all of our skills and good intentions will be undercut, and the failures sometimes blame-shifted onto us. That thought brings me around to the central reason behind why I’m writing today: We can’t be successful unless we are also good teachers and leaders. We have to want our patients to be successful on a very deep level. 

Last year my daughter Allison graduated at the top of her high school class, and it was easy to think “Wow! Look at what she did!” Yet it wasn’t just her efforts that made it happen, so the thought should be “Wow! Look at what WE did!” as the effort was communal and very philosophically-driven. It’s clear that Allison’s Principal and teachers LOVED her enough to invest a significant part of themselves in her development. You could feel it, see it, and hear it in their words. 

Are we similarly invested in our patients success? Are we doing a whole lot more than just being prescriptive? Are we investing a significant part of ourselves in our patients’ lives because we want to see them succeed? Can they feel it, see it, and hear it?  

By Paul A. Henny, DDS 

Effective leadership in dentistry requires open-mindedness and empathy, while at the same time, assertiveness, consistency, adaptableness, and resilience.  

That’s a tall order! 

Many of us struggle to be assertive and empathetic at the same time, particularly when we are under pressure. All too often, we lean into our positional power and superior knowledge and don’t stop to ask ourselves: 

• How does the patient feel about my message? 

• Does the patient understand the long-term implications of the information I have presented? 

It’s important to remind ourselves that decision-making is a two-step process: 

Step 1: The recognition of accurate, relevant, timely, and important new information 

Step 2: Reasoning to make choices that align with values and goals 

Few people fully understand the nature of their problems, needs, and the complex processes necessary to realize their goals when they first come into our dental offices. Patients often behave dogmatically or too emotionally, which leads them to choices that result in more failure and frustration. 

Our ability to facilitate learning in others and lead them to decisions with predictably better outcomes can be developed. This is good news! With understanding, practice, and reinforcement through successful experiences, we can all learn how to become more effective leaders and develop a more successful practice. 

The 6 Key Steps to Effectively Guiding Our Patients 

1. Slow down and manage your time more strategically to spend more time with each patient.
2. Demonstrate empathy. Stay in conversation and ask questions to understand what they know and how they feel about the information you are giving them. 
3. Create a safe and effective environment for learning. This entails slowing down your delivery of information into the bite sizes that are appropriate for the patient and pausing often for their minds to catch up and for them to experience self-discoveries.  
4. Show deference for the fact that each person is the best expert regarding themselves, their feelings, values, and goals. Let them know you will support them in their process and invite them to learn more and weigh their new knowledge against their values, priorities, and long-term goals.
5. Give each person enough time to make complex decisions as well as work through the logistics necessary to make their decisions fit into their life.
6. 6. Remain clear and assertive about what is in the patient’s best health interests and consistent with your values. Only proceed with treatment decisions that are mutually agreed upon as appropriate.

By Edwin A. McDonald, DDS 

It is amazing to me to realize that I have practiced for more than 40 years in a relationship based, fee for service dental practice. Dentistry has become much more complex during that time. What has not changed is the need for human beings to be loved, accepted, significant, understood, and heard. Also, people who have a high value for their health seek high clinical competence and thoughtful patient management.  

Two years ago, I started looking for a partner to continue providing my patients with comprehensive, relationship-based care. (My hands, back, and body had been telling me that it was time to slow down.) My primary goal in this transition was to create a future where the culture of my practice would continue, and the practice would thrive and grow. 

I received a call 18 months ago from my good friend, Dr. Lynne Gerlach. She said: “Mac, I want you to meet Dr. Shawn Luck.” Lynne went on to say, “I interview young dentists every day and I rarely meet people like him.” 

Shawn and I met, and I immediately understood what she meant. After a few more meetings, several phone calls with colleagues that knew Shawn well, and a thorough financial analysis, it was time for “Team Mac” to meet Dr. Shawn.  

Team relationships are critical to a successful transition. Shawn was met with enthusiasm from my team. That meant we could move forward with a detailed agreement that included terms of employment and terms of practice purchase.  

Shawn’s well-grounded character, confidence, enthusiasm, and intelligence were the factors that guided my decision. We both needed what each other had. I needed Shawn’s character, youth, energy, ambition, and strong desire to own a practice. He needed my clinical training, experience, and commitment to be a focused, consistent, and relentless teacher. 

I began communicating the transition with my team and patients a few months before meeting with Shawn. I mailed a formal letter to my patients that said that I saw three to five years of clinical practice remaining for myself. The letter began and ended with a big thank you for their loyalty, trust, and support. It let them know that I was actively looking for a young dentist to partner with who would continue to take care of them. This letter was a huge success with a thank you from almost every patient. A few patients began to schedule pending treatment that had been on their mind. 

We sent a second letter four months later to announce Dr. Luck. We began communicating about his arrival in person with enthusiasm and emailed a digital copy. The main takeaway here is that the transition immediately benefitted from consistent, focused, and abundant communication with all practice stakeholders about what we were planning and hoping for.  

We are in the middle of year one and I am focusing on mentoring Dr. Luck. We are hoping to play the infinite game as we create and pass on opportunities to the next generation. 

My hope for my Pankey Institute colleagues is you will surround yourself with great people that make you better. Build partnerships with them. Build trust at a deep level. Build community. Serve one another. Seek opportunities to pass on the values of relationship-based practice to the next generation. If you invite young dentists into a relationship and repeat the mentoring you received, we can all play this forward. Dr. Shawn Luck has already captured the spirit of wanting to do just that. 

By Mary Osborne, RDH 

Developing a partnership begins with an attitude of curiosity. It stems from a belief in the possibility that by working together we can achieve more than either of us can accomplish alone. With an attitude of curiosity we can develop the skill of listening and asking questions before going too quickly to teaching and telling. 

How do we help our patients see the part they can play in improving their health?  

We can begin by inviting the patient to share with us what they know about their health. They come to us with attitudes, beliefs, biases, and concerns about their health, as well as specific knowledge of their history. The more we know about where they have been the better able we will be to help them plan their future. We will have information to share about what we find and recommendations for how to proceed, but if we listen first we honor their perspective. We can also begin to hear their aspirations for their health in general and their dental health in particular. 

When dentists discover plaque or bleeding in an initial exam, they can tell the patient that the hygienist will help them with home care. But if we ask the patient if they would like help with home care and they say yes, we now have an invitation to give them information. The difference is subtle, but important.  

You can also ask the patient if a solution they have thought of or a recommendation you have made is something they would like to try. A yes is a commitment on some level to share in the oral hygiene process with you. Inviting and asking means moving the locus of control from you to the patient. I recognize that that is not our default mechanism, so doing this takes intention.  

How can we help patients to see us as a trusted advisor and seek our guidance? 

One of the things that I have learned over the years is that, when I remember who is really in control of the patients’ health, I am better able to partner with them. This process may take a little longer initially, but I would like to suggest we have all the time we need. We have the lifetime of our relationships with our patients.  

Once you agree that you have the mutual goal of moving toward improved health, you can invite them to deeper levels of conversation and understanding around health. You can avoid assuming what is best for them and help the physician inside each patient go to work. As they share their thoughts, they often become clearer about what they hope for.  

When you are genuinely interested in your patient, you earn a level of trust that opens the patient to hear more about their existing conditions and your concerns for them. By making connections with them over what is possible to achieve and what they want to achieve, you create a bond that opens the patient to your expert perspectives. When you ask for and respect their input on solutions, they are more likely to commit to a solution. 

When a new patient needs urgent treatment, how can we meet those treatment needs and still commence a lifetime journey toward health with the patient? 

Of course, we want to help our patients with immediate treatment when disease conditions are acute, but we want to do so in a way that inspires the patient to see the bigger, more comprehensive health picture. We want to help them see health as a journey and see us as empathetic fellow travelers who understand their suffering. As we facilitate dialogue about the health outcomes of treatment, we uncover their broader health aspirations. 

We intentionally deliver the message that we are here for them. We are interested in them and care about them as a person, and we let them know they can count on us to help them become healthier and maintain achieved levels of health. We do not allow the fact that the patient needed immediate relief to get in the way of a long-term commitment to their overall health.  

How do we engage our patients in being curious about their total health? 

At every visit, we can invite them into conversation about their health. The questions you ask will shape the conversation. Instead of “Any changes in your health history?” you might begin with, “How has your health been since the last time we were together?” Pause and listen to learn about your patient’s experiences, opinions, and feelings.  

In my experience, this process respects the physician that lives within each patient and leads to continuous co-discovery and collaboration toward health. Every conversation can empower the patient a little bit more to become clearer about their knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, biases, and barriers. The insights developed over the lifetime of your relationship enable you to become a trusted advisor to your patients.  

By exposing your interest about a range of health issues (diabetes, heart disease, obstructive sleep apnea, weight loss, smoking cessation, stress reduction, etc.), they will see you as a professional with broad knowledge and a worthwhile perspective. They will see you as a valuable resource. They will see you as someone who knows about health and ¾ more important ¾ someone who knows them.  

By Mary Osborne, RDH 

One way to involve patients in making choices about their health is to ask for an invitation to give information. Everyone on the team can look for ways to get permission before taking action. For example, if the dentist observes bleeding or plaque while doing an initial exam, the dentists often say, “The hygienist will help you with that.” That’s okay but getting an invitation for the hygienist is even more helpful. Instead of telling the patient what the hygienist will do, the dentist could ask for an invitation. “Would you like the hygienist to help you with that when you see her?” Patients typically say yes, and that sets the hygienist up for a different conversation when she sees that patient.  

When the hygienist sees a note that the patient wants some help removing deposits in a certain area, she has been invited to give information. The hygienist can say, “So, I understand from the doctor that you’d like to have some help with being more effective at removing the deposits that are around this tooth on the lower right.” 

In this circumstance, I might ask the patient, “What have you tried in cleaning that area?” I pause and allow the patient to think and speak. Perhaps they would demonstrate how they brush or floss in that area. If I do make a recommendation to a patient, I like to follow it with, “Is that something you’d like to try?” 

The dentist and hygienist are a team, and the patient is the third team member in partnering for health. In ideal practice, all clinical and front office team members are part of the collaboration and share their understanding of the patient with each other. Many times, especially with elderly patients, I find there is a family member who is a health partner, and we can invite them to participate in consultations. In dentistry, when we become trusted health advisors to our patients, we can also influence their choices in other areas of their health.  

When we listen well, we can filter our information through the lens of improving overall health. We can make connections between their perspective and our own. When we understand the patient as an individual with special circumstances, opinions, and emotions, we can help them get in touch with their own aspirations for health and help them move toward those goals.  

By Paul A. Henny, DDS, and Deborah E. Bush, MA 

The traditional rational economic model used in classical decision-making theory routinely fails to predict patient behavior because it fails to consider the psychology of decision-making and the inductive neuro process necessary to change one’s mind about what is best for oneself. 

Classic Decision Theory 

Classic Decision Theory (CDT) models a decision-making process that involves a fixed set of alternatives about which a person knows little. In response, they relate their limited knowledge to the situation at hand, use their beliefs and expectations associated with the options to project an outcome, and then use logic to make the final decision based on their goals. 

According to this theory, people primarily make decisions based on their desire to maximize gains and minimize losses, an objective. This deductive process is largely driven by a heuristic known as “scarcity bias.” However, anyone who has practiced dentistry for more than a day outside of a teaching institution knows that CDT fails to explain many of the decisions patients make when they’re confronted with a complex problem they don’t fully understand.  

Simple decisions such as “Should I get this filling replaced because it’s broken?” or “Should I allow Dr. Smith to help me make this tooth stop hurting?” are predictable. What’s much less predictable is whether a person will allow us to equilibrate their occlusion or leverage restorative dentistry to reestablish proper form, function, esthetics, and neuromuscular modulation. Why? Because these are complex issues that require an understanding of how the stomatognathic system works before the proposed solution makes sense and appears to be the logical best option to the patient. 

Neuroeconomics is an interdisciplinary field that aims to explain human decision-making. By integrating psychology and neuroscience, this discipline can help us better understand how humans process alternatives to make choices and follow through on a plan of action. Neuroscience affirms that re-evaluating perspectives is a right-brain activity and an inductive process. 

The Dentist’s Challenge  

In practice, we often see patients making decisions we think are unwise for their long-term oral health. A person’s values and belief system influence their decisions. Not only may the person’s understanding and belief system be underdeveloped in relation to the value of properly planned, designed, and executed health-centered restorative dentistry, but their memories may be distorted. In this case, the person makes what we perceive to be unwise decisions because their memories do not align well with our understanding of the situation. They don’t know what we know.  

Helping Patients Think and Feel Differently Through Inductive Reasoning 

Reassessment, modification, or outright replacement of beliefs is a right-brain process known as inductive reasoning. The purpose of Co-Discovery is to take the patient through an inductive reasoning process. Oral health providers who understand how and why Co-Discovery works have experienced how it can change the trajectory of a person’s decision-making process. 

Our challenge is to create an optimal learning environment in which people can safely reevaluate their beliefs, values, and priorities. Being patient with patients and taking our time to guide them through the inductive process of Co-Discovery will comfortably provoke new thinking, new beliefs, and new emotions. Through the process, a great many patients come to realize that their historical perspective is not serving them well, and they decide to have that equilibration or restorative dentistry that will serve them best in the long-term.  

They may not choose treatment the first time it is recommended but will subsequently realize it is in their best interest. We just have to stay in conversation with them in Co-Discovery mode and guide them through the inductive process to arrive at their new goals.  

Long-term, this is healthier for dentists and their care teams as well. The conversations we have with patients change the trajectory of our dental practices. Better conversations result in better decisions, which in turn result in better outcomes. Better outcomes result in lower stress and a thriving practice that is much more fulfilling for dentists and care team members.   

By Mary Osborne, RDH 

Dr. Rachel Naomi Remin says, “Doctor, you may know what’s best for the disease the patient has but that’s not the same as knowing what’s best for the patient.”  

It’s difficult to let go of our own assumptions about what we’re supposed to do, how healthy this person should be based on our criteria, and what is the best path forward in every situation. Our clinical training leads us to believe that we’re supposed to know what’s best for our patient. 

There is another quote, from Dr. Albert Schweitzer, which has challenged my thinking about patient care for a long time:  

“Patients carry their own doctor inside.”  

I believe that every one of us has opinions, ideas, and knowledge about our own health. That is the doctor inside. Dr. Schweitzer said patients come to us knowing we have expertise, but “we are at our best when we give the physician who resides within each patient a chance to go to work.” When we do that, we help people become healthier. 

There is a place for our solutions. There is a place for our expertise to show up. But if we slow ourselves down a half step, we are often amazed at the answers patients come up with. They can be downright creative and elegant. The reason they are elegant is because they are their solutions, and patients are more likely to follow through with solutions they conceive. I’m not saying we shouldn’t guide them to understanding the advantages and disadvantages of their solutions and other possibilities that you we know are out there, but we should be open to allowing them to think about solutions and not prejudge their choices. 

For example, if a patient says she or he doesn’t have time to floss, I was trained to say, “Well, don’t you watch the evening news? You can do it while you’re watching the news. Right?” That’s about me having the solution. But now I sit back and say to the patient, “Well, it sounds like you’re very busy. Is there any time at all during the day when you’re sitting, and you feel that you could floss easily?” When I ask the question, they usually have a better answer than the nightly news. It’s a better solution because it’s their solution. They have bought into it at some level.  

In many cases, we see the “treatment” for a problem as we’re seeing the problem. That’s something that we take a great deal of pride in. But when we come together with our patient, sitting eye to eye, we can often come to a much more elegant treatment plan, one that moves us more comprehensively toward our goal of improved health. In between what is and what is possible, we encourage the patient to discover the level of health to which they aspire. We come to mutual agreement about going forward in a certain way to accomplish some things that are bigger and better than just solving “a problem.” 

By Paul A. Henny, DDS 

Today, I am revisiting the value of personal authenticity and its transformational power within truly helping relationships. We know can’t evolve into becoming more authentic with our patients until we first “know ourselves,” which is another way of saying “until we’ve developed a lot of personal insight.” 

Personal insight is the beginning point of understanding what tends to drive our behavior and thinking, therefore, it’s the beginning point of change. But there’s another key variable in the facilitation-of-change process that’s often overlooked: What is the level of personal insight within the person we are attempting to help?  

What happens when we and our patients share similar values? 

We’ve all had experiences with patients with whom we easily and almost automatically connect. The conversations flow smoothly, and there’s a lot of agreement regarding what needs to be addressed, how and when. It happens because these folks share similar values and priorities, and likely, they’ve had some personal experiences that strongly support those beliefs. 

But let’s be honest. Those moments are rare for most dentists who have undifferentiated practices. 

What happens in undifferentiated dental practices? 

When I use the adjective “undifferentiated,” I mean the practice has a lot of patients who come for reasons other than shared values, agendas, and purpose. A patient’s dental insurance is a prime reason patients go to a particular dentist. Nearly free new patient exams and limited x-rays offered by many dentists is another reason. Being accessible for emergency dentistry in the patient’s local neighborhood is yet another. 

PPOs are likely the most common reason a patient sticks with an undifferentiated dentist. Patients with “insurance” don’t really have insurance. They have a minimal and limiting benefit plan disguised AS IF it were insurance. Consequently, misconceptions occur due to the intentionally confusing language. 

Additionally, insurance causes people to naturally focus more on their benefits (a reductionistic concept) than on their health (a holistic concept). So, in a very twisted and often dysfunctional way, dental insurance can cause people to make bad decisions that negatively influence their health as they psychologically prioritize money over their health.  

The Scarcity Bias 

The human brain has a bias toward scarcity thinking unless it’s actively circumvented through more right-side prefrontal cortex involvement. This scarcity bias occurs as most dental patients make treatment choices, and when this happens, we have a choice. 

1. We can play along and rationalize it. “It is what it is.” We can take the checks and focus on economy-of-scale strategies and production. 

1. We can actively work to remove insurance carrier influence from the patient decision-making process while facilitating greater patient involvement and problem ownership. 

Put another way: We either accept the codependency relationships (and all the anger, confusion, disappointment, and frustration that it brings along with the insurance benefits), or we actively work at creating interdependent relationships with patients, wherein they become the co-creators of their health future and share responsibilities associated with that goal. 

The Violation of Personal Boundaries 

When we actively participate in dependency-centric relationships, we violate interpersonal boundaries.  

On this, Avrom King brilliantly commented, “Dependency is the word we use to identify an individual who, for whatever reason, cannot claim and develop their latent personal power; instead, they negotiate psychological contracts with other people whose ego needs are served by accepting responsibility for the dependent person’s outcomes.” 

The minute we start to take responsibility for other people’s responsibilities, we begin a journey down a road that commonly leads to dysfunction, conflict, and frustration. 

Heath-centered dentistry is only possible through interdependent relationships, which means that ALL codependent relationships aren’t health-centered. They are centered on other things that are often associated with insecurity.  

To be continued in Part 2… 

By Mary Osborne, RDH 

How can we make recommendations for care without fully understanding what the patient aspires to? The patient’s goals are the context or should be the context for recommendations that we are going to make as their partner in health. Too often, context is the missing piece in our conversations with patients.  

I’ve heard that Dr. Bob Barkley would say to his patients, “You know, Mrs. Jones, if I had taken X-rays of you every six months since you were born, we would have 80 sets of x-rays. And if I stacked them one on top of another and then thumbed through them, I would have a movie of the health of your mouth for the last 40 years. We would see how your teeth changed from health to the degree of breakdown we see today. We can’t do anything now to change that movie. That movie has already been made. But, if you like, you and I can work together to create the movie for the next 40 years. Is that something you’d like to do?” 

If we get agreement from the patient, “Yes, I’d like to work together with you to plan for the next 40 years,” that’s not a specific goal, but it begins to create a context for our recommendations. Instead of the provider setting the expectations of the patient, it becomes more of a mutual agreement to long-term planning, so that there’s a buy-in by both parties in the relationship. That’s moving toward a partnership.  

When we set a general mutual goal during the preclinical consults, it fits in well with our not knowing what we will uncover during the clinical piece of the appointment. Dentists and hygienists can be direct about it, and I think there is value in saying, “I’d like to come to a mutual agreement that we work together to understand what is going on in your mouth, and based on the circumstances we find, come up with the best solutions for you. Is that something you would like to do?” 

We can set expectations by saying, “As we go through this process, I will be asking for your input. We’ll take it slow and be thorough. We’ll discuss what you and I discover, and together we can think through the next steps you may want to take. How does that sound to you?” 

I think it is essential to this process to invite the patient to be in shared control by asking, “Would you like to proceed with the clinical examination? Do you have any questions for me before we begin?” 

When we come to the conversation as fellow travelers with the attitude that “the two of us can work together,” we open ourselves to working toward mutual agreement about what it’s going to take for this particular person to achieve the level of health to which they aspire. Starting as partners with the goal of improved health is a low-stress way of being in a relationship that is comfortable for both parties.